SanDisk Extreme PRO 64 GB SDXC Memory Card, Up to 170 MB/s, Class 10, U3, V30
January 1, 2019 - Comment
SANDISK FC 64GB Ext V30 UHS-I U3 SDXC 170MBs Product Features Shot speeds up to 90MB/s, transfer speeds up to 170MB/s Perfect for shooting 4K UHD video and sequential burst mode photography Capture uninterrupted video with UHS Speed Class 3 (U3) and Video Speed Class 30 (V30) Built for and tested in harsh conditions: temperature-proof,
Find Out More
£19.99Amazon.co.uk Price
(as of April 19, 2020 9:36 am BST - Details) + Add To Wish List
(as of April 19, 2020 9:36 am BST - Details) + Add To Wish List
){kind=link}
I wouldn’t dream of using anything else I’ve used SanDisk SDHC cards for ages and always found them to be reliable (famous last words?) and the Extreme Pro card’s speed makes it ideal for fast burst photography and 4K video.I only ever use 32GB cards (I have half a dozen of them!) because, although their content is regularly backed up to memory sticks or hard drives, I’d rather risk losing only that amount of data than that on one of the larger capacity cards. I can’t even begin to imagine what I’d do if a 512GB card…
Great! Used this in my Nikon D3300 camera, I needed a high speed, high capacity SD card to cope with the high-quality pictures and the high shutter speed of the camera. I get no lag at all, it has a ridiculously fast write speed, I can transfer a good 500 photos from this to my computer in under a minute. Very pleased! I recommend this product to people with DSLR cameras and high-end bridge cameras as they require fast write speeds, it is quite pricey but you get good quality.
Beware of counterfeits! Test with h2testw on arrival! Received a counterfeit card. Speeds were ~11MB/s write/read nowhere near advertised and widely tested ~90MB/s. Checked on two laptops, my old Sandisk Ultra 80MB/s runs at ~30MB/s write & ~50MB/s read (well I don’t have the fastest reader on the planet, but it’s not an excuse for 11MB/s).Tested both on synthetic tests and real life tests.Print quality of the label and font details looked rather dodgy at times. Returned.